I'm more familiar with redhat family, so less learning to do.Ĭon: Ubuntu has more documentation for new users, and proprietary software like games is usually only tested against Ubuntu meaning if I download something from steam I sometimes need to manually install needed library packages. Of particular note, Fedora Workstation includes the GNOME 3.18 desktop environment and the LibreOffice 5.0 office suite. I use RHEL at work and AWS Linux for stuff I do on the side, so using their mother distro at home means I see and become comfortable with features before they're brought into those enterprise distros. This is easy enough to change on its own, but I feel a bit anxious using a distro that has such a bad policy as default. Fedora's 700 make sense to me and follows security best practices of minimal permissiveness. Ubuntu's default new user home permissions of 755 are absolutely insane for a desktop, and unsuitable for many server workloads. 17:23 Fedora Workstation Wayland Test Day: 18:02 Libre Application Summit 2016 14:36 X crash during Fedora. I like dnf better than apt, it's faster, I don't need to use a different command to search vs install packages, the syntax is more straightforward and intuitive for my way of thinking. ![]() Pros and cons are hard to nail down since they're so subjective. Less documentation than something like Ubuntu or Debian. Cons: Security focus makes it less convenient than other distros. Has corporate backing so it's not going anywhere and fairly well executed. Gives you a largely vanilla DE experience. One is Ubuntu based, one is Fedora based. Pros: Nearly as up to date as Arch, but more stable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |